PEKO Rewards Hub

    Reports / Research finding

    What share of first-time restaurant customers never come back?

    From the report: The State of F&B Customer Retention in Southeast Asia 2026 — 1.3 The retention gap

    Most first-time customers do not come back, and the share is larger than most operators assume. In the only merchant-level measurement in this research, 60–75% of first-visit customers had not returned within 90 days P.

    Most first-time customers do not return.
    Across PEKO venues in Vietnam, 60–75% of first-visit customers had not returned within 90 days P.
    The pattern is structural, not a Vietnamese peculiarity: the customer had no bad experience and no reason to remember the venue.

    What the measurement covers

    The State of F&B Customer Retention in Southeast Asia 2026 — 1.3 The retention gap
    MeasureValueBasis
    First-visit customers not returning within 90 days60–75%Venue-level range across the sample
    Repeat-rate lift within 90 days of activating cadence-based win-back+8–15 percentage pointsVenue-level range; platform-level claim
    Lead time at which lapse risk is flagged3–7 days before the customer's usual return window closesModel output
    Customers recovered per month, mid-sized venue30–45Count of guests returning after a win-back message, not a rate
    Transaction history needed before prediction reaches target precision~14 daysModel calibration
    Venues onboarded3,000Cumulative signups, including free tier

    These figures are measured across PEKO venues in Vietnam between January 2024 and June 2026 P. They are recorded as a range rather than a single number because venue-to-venue variance is large and the sample is not segmented by format. They are Vietnamese, and we do not present them as expectations for Malaysia or Singapore — no equivalent merchant-level measurement exists yet in those markets.

    Why first visitors do not return

    The usual explanation — something went wrong — fits almost none of them. A first visit that ends with a satisfied customer and no exchange of identity leaves the venue with no way to appear in that person's next decision. The next decision is then made in a delivery app, or by whatever is closest at the time.

    The second mechanism is lapse timing. A customer who comes every nine days and has not come for eighteen is at risk; a customer who comes monthly and has not come for eighteen days is not. Fixed 'inactive for 30 days' rules, which most rule-based systems use, fire too late for the first customer and too early for the second — so a first-visit guest with a nine-day natural rhythm is gone long before any reminder is sent.

    The third is enrolment. Venues where guests self-enrol by QR or receipt capture accumulate members at peak hours — exactly when cashier-dependent programmes stop enrolling — so the first visit is also the visit most likely to be missed by a programme that depends on staff asking.

    What to measure instead

    • Second-visit conversion: of the guests you identified this month, what share came back at all. This is the number a retention system moves.
    • Time to second visit, per customer, rather than a single days-inactive threshold for everyone.
    • Share of covers you can identify. A programme that captures a tenth of your guests cannot report a return rate for the other nine tenths.

    Question this page answers

    What percentage of first-time restaurant customers never return?

    Most first-time customers do not return. Across PEKO venues in Vietnam, 60–75% of first-visit customers had not returned within 90 days. The pattern is structural, not a Vietnamese peculiarity: the customer had no bad experience and no reason to remember the venue.

    How to read the evidence tags in this report

    M Measured, third-party — a published figure from a government body, central bank, research house or news organisation, cited by number in the Sources section.

    P PEKO merchant data — measured across PEKO venues in Vietnam, January 2024 to June 2026. These figures are Vietnamese. They are not extended to Malaysia or Singapore as measurements.

    E Estimate or model — a worked example, projection or inference built by PEKO from M and P inputs. Assumptions are stated where the figure appears.

    Merchant-level measurements in this edition are drawn from Vietnam. Every Malaysian and Singaporean number in this report is M or E; merchant counts by market are not published. The 2027 edition will add measured figures from all three markets.

    Delivery-platform commission rates are not published by any platform in these markets. Every commission figure here is an independent estimate or a third-party report, cited as such, and may not reflect any specific operator's contract. Third-party names and marks belong to their owners. Corrections: research@heypeko.com.

    Sources

    1. [P]PEKO merchant data, Vietnam, January 2024 – June 2026. Methodology at heypeko.com/methodology.
    2. [E]PEKO estimates and worked models; assumptions stated at the point of use.
    3. [M-17]Reichheld, F. F. and Sasser, W. E. (1990). 'Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services', Harvard Business Review, September–October 1990.

    Read the full section — The State of F&B Customer Retention in Southeast Asia 2026

    Also in the report: 7.4 What PEKO's Vietnamese data shows

    Machine-readable findings: JSON · CSV

    Tiếng Việt

    Published · Alvin Koh · Published under CC BY 4.0. Reuse the figures with attribution to PEKO and a link to this page.

    See how PEKO turns these numbers into repeat visits